"Is BGP safe yet?" test
ankost at podolsk.ru
Mon Apr 20 15:08:14 UTC 2020
Hi Nanog list,
Would be interesting to hear your opinion on this:
We have cases when residential customers ask support "why is your
service isn't safe?" pointing to that article. It's difficult to answer
correctly considering that the asking person usually doesn't know what
BGP is and what it's used for, save for understanding it's function,
design and possible misuses.
IMO, on one hand it promotes and is aimed to push RPKI deployment, on
the other hand is this a proper way for it? How ethical is to claim
other market players unsafe, considering that scope of possible impact
of not implementing it has completely different scale for a small stub
network and big transit provider?
More information about the NANOG