Cogent sales reps who actually respond

Tue Sep 17 02:58:21 UTC 2019

And why are they not on any public peering exchange? Why only private?

> On Sep 16, 2019, at 19:35, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>>> On Sep 16, 2019, at 17:48 , Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 1. Sprint peering battle. Google it
>>> 2. He.net peering battle. Google it.
>>> 3. Google IPv6 peering battle. Google it.
>>> 
>>> All of which point to them being pompous assholes.
>> 
>> or point to them treating ipv6 the same as ipv4 when it comes to
>> peering, tech, ...  we are supposed to think ipv6 parity is a good
>> thing.
>> 
>> randy
> 
> Actually, their peering behavior in IPv4 is not quite as arrogant as it is in IPv6, so no, they aren’t doing parity.
> 
> Owen
> 