Cogent sales reps who actually respond
Stephen M.
stephen.myspam at gmail.com
Mon Sep 16 22:59:18 UTC 2019
Please don’t praise or complain like we’re supposed to take it at a total face value. If you don’t like them so much - we are you’re audience. Explain.
If you like Cogent - explain.
If you don’t like Cogent - explain.
Cheers,
Stephen
//please pardon any brevities - sent from mobile//
> On Sep 16, 2019, at 10:01 PM, Mike Lyon <mike.lyon at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Whenever asked about Cogent, i just say, “Friends don’t let friends use Cogent.”
>
> I’ve told two of their reps over the past two years that even if the service was free, i wouldn’t use it. And yet, they still call.
>
> -Mike
>
>>> On Sep 16, 2019, at 13:53, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> In message <E814E5F6-F386-4AAE-BADA-E423D299A4FB at delong.com>,
>>> Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Given their practice of harvesting whois updates in order to spam newly
>>> acquired AS contacts, any time it is my decision, Cogent is ineligible
>>> as a vendor.
>>
>> So I guess then that their aiding and abetting of fraud and IP block
>> theft, as I documented here recently, is an entirely secondary concern...
>> as long as they don't spam you, yes?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> rfg
More information about the NANOG
mailing list