Cogent sales reps who actually respond

Stephen M. stephen.myspam at gmail.com
Mon Sep 16 22:59:18 UTC 2019


Please don’t praise or complain like we’re supposed to take it at a total face value. If you don’t like them so much - we are you’re audience. Explain. 

If you like Cogent - explain.
If you don’t like Cogent - explain.

Cheers,
Stephen

//please pardon any brevities - sent from mobile//

> On Sep 16, 2019, at 10:01 PM, Mike Lyon <mike.lyon at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Whenever asked about Cogent, i just say, “Friends don’t let friends use Cogent.”
> 
> I’ve told two of their reps over the past two years that even if the service was free, i wouldn’t use it. And yet, they still call.
> 
> -Mike
> 
>>> On Sep 16, 2019, at 13:53, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> In message <E814E5F6-F386-4AAE-BADA-E423D299A4FB at delong.com>, 
>>> Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Given their practice of harvesting whois updates in order to spam newly
>>> acquired AS contacts, any time it is my decision, Cogent is ineligible
>>> as a vendor.
>> 
>> So I guess then that their aiding and abetting of fraud and IP block
>> theft, as I documented here recently, is an entirely secondary concern...
>> as long as they don't spam you, yes?
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> rfg



More information about the NANOG mailing list