IPAM recommendations

Thu Sep 5 12:20:19 UTC 2019

Lets focus on the technology. Netbox is solid. I am leaning towards this
since its open source and there is some librenms integration.

I was using another product till few days ago (i won’t mention name) i am
not happy and decided to go with something open source

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 21:16 Mel Beckman <mel at beckman.org> wrote:

> Todd,
>
> I don’t think this is a reasonable understanding of Nanog. Nanog members
> ask each other for operational tool recommendations all the time, and since
> these products are right up the alley of Nanog’s mission — network
> operations — it’s a perfectly reasonable use of Nanog.
>
> But you read a single comment without researching any Nanog history, which
> would immediately show you how frequently Nanog serves in just this kind of
> valuable role, THAT’S unkind.
>
>
>  -mel
>
> On Sep 5, 2019, at 2:56 AM, Todd Underwood <toddunder at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> i don't think that this is a reasonable use of nanog.  if you have
> research to present and then a question to ask, that's totally great.  this
> is especially true if you can add evaluative criteria and information
> before asking questions from people who have relevant experience.
>
> you read a single web page and are asking nanog to do your homework for
> you.  that's unkind and is taking advantage of the attention and goodwill
> of the community here.  this is becoming a pattern.  please either do some
> research yourself and start a conversation substantively, or look to paid
> consultants to evaluate your software/hardware/datacenter space/networking
> gear etc.
>
> best,
>
> t
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:42 AM Mehmet Akcin <mehmet at akcin.net> wrote:
>
>> Not much beyond this,
>> https://appuals.com/the-5-best-ip-address-management-ipam-software/
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:39 PM Todd Underwood <toddunder at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> What have you evaluated so far?  Can you share your evaluation grid, how
>>> you selected the candidates, how you are weighting criteria and specific
>>> interesting findings so far?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> t
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:37 AM Mehmet Akcin <mehmet at akcin.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus
>>>> (almost must, almost..). 40-50K IPs to be managed.
>>>>
>>>> thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>> --
Mehmet
+1-424-298-1903
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190905/fa8ba5e0/attachment.html>