fuzzy subnet aggregation
Antonio Querubin
tony at lavanauts.org
Mon Oct 28 02:30:53 UTC 2019
Are you trying to reduce the number of ACL rules that include a known set of addresses but also minimize covered addresses that are not part of the mandatory set?
Tony
> On Oct 27, 2019, at 12:29, Joe Maimon <jmaimon at jmaimon.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 3:09 PM Joe Maimon <jmaimon at jmaimon.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> your aim is to get to maximum aggregation .. with some overage, like
>> 90% of a /24 ?
>> so missing like 25 addresses in a whole /24.. (for instance)
>
> I would be happy to get /29's missing 3 /28's missing 5, etc...
>
> This is not punitive, its about scale.
>
> Joe
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list