fuzzy subnet aggregation

Sun Oct 27 22:57:17 UTC 2019

On 10/27/19 4:27 PM, Joe Maimon wrote:
> I would be happy to get /29's missing 3 /28's missing 5, etc...

Are you good with rounding up to the next larger network if you have 
~62% of the members?

> This is not punitive, its about scale.

ACK

-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4008 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20191027/762368da/attachment.bin>