Viability of GNS3 network simulation for testing features/configurations.

Wed Oct 16 17:01:56 UTC 2019

Totally agree with Tom here. It's going to work really well for most
things. But if you're testing code for bugs you NEED to do it on the same
hardware you have in your environment in an actual lab.

- Mike Bolitho

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:56 AM Tom Beecher <beecher at beecher.cc> wrote:

> GNS3 can do a heck of a lot, and the price is definitely right.
>
> I have used it extensively for initial fleshing out of designs or ideas,
> protocol nerding, automation interaction testing, etc. There certainly
> other tools out there, but being able to visually draw a topology out,
> connect the dots, and have an environment to test in about 10 minutes is
> very nice. There is an API you can hook into to do some of that for you if
> you are so inclined, but that would depend on your use case and resources.
> For how I've used it, never been required.
>
> Some of the VMs from vendors can be pretty CPU and/or RAM intensive, so
> I've had the best experience running them all on a dedicated server, not
> locally. Again, use case dependent. For code testing I would always run the
> test set on hardware as well for likely obvious reasons.
>
> If you really get into the weeds with it you can do quite a lot.
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:52 AM Ryland Kremeier <
> rkremeier at barryelectric.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m currently in the process of setting up a near identical network to
>> our own in GNS3 for testing purposes. Has anyone here tried this before to
>> any success? We need to buy the Cisco IOSv image to continue with the sim
>> so I figured I would inquire here first before diving in.
>>
>>
>>
>> All info is appreciated,
>>
>> --
>>
>> Ryland Kremeier
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20191016/1ee8605e/attachment.html>