"Using Cloud Resources to Dramatically Improve Internet Routing"

Thu Oct 10 23:08:43 UTC 2019

Feel that this is more down the line of RFC 7511, no? ;-)

—Dennis

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 07:25 J. Hellenthal via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
wrote:

> See RFC 1149 & 2549
>
> ;-)
>
> --
>  J. Hellenthal
>
> The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says
> a lot about anticipated traffic volume.
>
> > On Oct 7, 2019, at 11:29, Keith Medcalf <kmedcalf at dessus.com> wrote:
> >
> > 
> >> On Monday, 7 October, 2019 08:55, Rich Kulawiec <rsk at gsp.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:42:11PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> >
> >>> Otherwise, an impressive amount of WTF. My favorite: "while
> >>> communication by servers ___on the ground___ might take hundreds of
> >>> milliseconds, in the cloud the same operation may take only one
> >>> millisecond from one machine to another"
> >
> >> My favorite: "The researchers expect their cloud-based system will be
> >> more secure than the Internet is today [...]"  Apparently they're
> > blissfully
> >> unaware that there is no such thing as "cloud security".
> >
> > I would be interested to know how one connects to their "cloud"?  Do I
> > need an "Evaporation Adapter" for my computer to send to their cloud?
> > And do I need a "Rain Collector" to receive from it?  I suppose I also
> > need the computer to be outside exposed to the elements -- putting it
> > under a brolly would interfere with incoming rain from the cloud ...
> > Plus I suppose it would not work very well at all in the desert, but
> > downloading would be very high bandwidth in the rainforest (or during
> > monsoon season).
> >
> > :)
> >
> > --
> > The fact that there's a Highway to Hell but only a Stairway to Heaven
> > says a lot about anticipated traffic volume.
> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20191010/e99a44f7/attachment.html>