IPv6 Pain Experiment
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Tue Oct 8 08:11:28 UTC 2019
> On Oct 7, 2019, at 23:59 , Masataka Ohta <mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
>
> William Herrin wrote:
>
>>> I think TCPng/UDPng with 32/48 bit port numbers combined with NAT/A+P,
>>> which is obviously fully operational with existing IPv4 backbone, is
>>> better.
>
>> Not a fan of port numbers.
>
> Separation between address and port is vague.
Explain that to ICMP packets.
>
>> If we're going to replace TCP and UDP, initiate
>> the link with a name (e.g. dns name),
>
> The point of TCP use IP address for identification is hosts
> can confirm IP address is true by 3 way handshaking.
And UDP?
Owen
More information about the NANOG
mailing list