IPv6 Pain Experiment

Michel Py michel.py at tsisemi.com
Mon Oct 7 18:34:28 UTC 2019


> William Herrin wrote :
> I want to divert from the current flame war to make my biennial semi-serious reminder that it was at least theoretically possible to
> expand the IPv4 address space rather than make a whole new protocol. That we did not do so was a failure of imagination.
> http://bill.herrin.us/network/ipxl.html

That could have worked. Eventually, some form of IPv4 with "just" more bits could surface, but it will take a decade or more.
When did you write this ? I read it before, just can't remember how long ago.

Michel.

TSI Disclaimer:  This message and any files or text attached to it are intended only for the recipients named above and contain information that may be confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not forward, copy, use or otherwise disclose this communication or the information contained herein. In the event you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, and then delete all copies of it from your system. Thank you!...


More information about the NANOG mailing list