IPv6 Pain Experiment

Mon Oct 7 17:48:06 UTC 2019

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:48 PM Michel Py <michel.py at tsisemi.com> wrote:

> > Owen DeLong wrote :
> > How would you have made it possible for a host that only understands
> 32-bit addresses to exchange traffic with a host that only has a 128-bit
> address?
>
> With some kind of NAT mechanism, naturally.
>

I want to divert from the current flame war to make my biennial
semi-serious reminder that it was at least theoretically possible to expand
the IPv4 address space rather than make a whole new protocol. That we did
not do so was a failure of imagination.

http://bill.herrin.us/network/ipxl.html

> > How would you have made a 128-bit address more human-readable? Does it
> really matter?
>
> Everyone gets the numbers.
>

Everyone thinks they get numbers. Until they try to compute a netmask or
perform any other non-rote IP networking task. The people who get hex tend
to actually get numbers. Both ways. If you want to know for sure whether
the other person understood you, explain it in hex.

Regards,
Bill Herrin

-- 
William Herrin
bill at herrin.us
https://bill.herrin.us/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20191007/44ce8b81/attachment.html>