Update to BCP-38?

Thu Oct 3 21:34:33 UTC 2019

On Thu, 03 Oct 2019 15:28:30 -0600, "Keith Medcalf" said:
> On Thursday, 3 October, 2019 11:50, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf at gmail.com> wrote:
> > A security geek would be all over me - "too many clues!".

> Anyone who says something like that is not a "security geek".  They are a
> "security poser", interested primarily in "security by obscurity" and "security
> theatre", and have no clue what they are talking about.

Amen to that.

If you've been pwned hard enough that vlan numbers are useful to the attacker,
the fact the attacker knows your vlan numbers is the *least* of your problems....
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20191003/19972b5c/attachment.sig>