This DNS over HTTP thing

Thu Oct 3 14:16:34 UTC 2019

On 03/10/2019 13:36, Masataka Ohta wrote:
>> It also aides the normalisation of an entirely detestable practice.
> 
> IWF does not aide so.

No, the normalisation of an entirely detestable practice comes from the
opposite of IWF involvement; you suggested that we should permit child
pornography on the Web/Internet, as opposed to censoring it? To catch
criminals, and to make it unprofitable?

I had stated that a lack of profit does not stop those inclined to abuse
children for sexual gratification, and also that doing absolutely
nothing to prohibit child pornography serves to normalise its existence.

>> look as if you were suggesting that in the UK we are very successful in
>> making money from child pornography *by censoring* child pornography?
> 
> "they" means those who are likely to be guests of Epstein.

Oh yes, I forgot that the possibility that one member of the Royal
Family sharing the alleged inclination of Epstein to abuse underage
children, made the whole United Kingdom a profiteering empire of child
pornography.

If you're going to call out the whole of the UK for something
defamatory, at the very least take the time to think about it without
your tinfoil hat. ;)

-- 
Tom