RIPE our of IPv4

Mark Andrews marka at isc.org
Mon Nov 25 19:46:52 UTC 2019


It requires both sides to move to IPv6.  Why should the cost of maintaining working networks be borne alone by the eyeball networks?   That is what is mostly happening today with CGN.

Every server that offers services to the public should be making them available over IPv6.   Most of the CDNs support both transports. Why are you scared to tick the box for IPv6?  HTTPS doesn’t care which transport is used. 

-- 
Mark Andrews

> On 26 Nov 2019, at 03:53, Dmitry Sherman <dmitry at interhost.net> wrote:
> 
>  I believe it’s Eyeball network’s matter to free IPv4 blocks and move to v6.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Dmitry Sherman
> 
> 
> 
>>> On 25 Nov 2019, at 18:08, Billy Crook <BCrook at unrealservers.net> wrote:
>>> 
>> 
>> Huh.  I guess we get to go home early today then?  And look into that whole "Aye Pee Vee Sicks" thing next week aye boss?
>> 
>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 8:58 AM Dmitry Sherman <dmitry at interhost.net> wrote:
>>> Just received a mail that RIPE is out of IPv4:
>>> 
>>> Dear colleagues,
>>> 
>>> Today, at 15:35 UTC+1 on 25 November 2019, we made our final /22 IPv4 allocation from the last remaining addresses in our available pool. We have now run out of IPv4 addresses.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Dmitry Sherman
>>> Interhost Networks
>>> www.interhost.co.il
>>> Dmitry at interhost.net
>>> Mob: 054-3181182
>>> Sent from Steve's creature 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20191126/8baea4fa/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list