Landing Stations used as datacenter

Fri Nov 15 23:45:12 UTC 2019

My mistake, I was also wrong about the landing site location being there, I located the site using city permitting information It's 6KM away at a local beach(woodbine).

Regards,
Andrew Paolucci

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, November 15, 2019 6:42 PM, Clayton Zekelman <clayton at MNSi.Net> wrote:

> Crosslake does not use the Enwave cooling pipes to enter 151 Front.
>
> Torix is at 151 Front, but 151 Front is not Torix.
>
> At 06:35 PM 15/11/2019, Andrew Paolucci via NANOG wrote:
>
>> Fresh water might not be in your scope for the article, but I believe crosslakefibre.ca operates a link across Lake Ontario, Buffalo to Toronto at TORIX 151 Front Street, but you'd need to verify with them if indeed the landing comes directly into the facility, this may be the case though as lake water is used for cooling within the facility providing conduits already in place.
>>
>> Can't wait to read the article!
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andrew Paolucci
>>
>> â€â€â€â€â€â€â€ Original Message â€â€â€â€â€â€â€
>> On Friday, November 15, 2019 6:20 PM, Javier J <javier at advancedmachines.us> wrote:
>>
>>> I would think that just a few extra fractions of a second from the cable station to a DC/IX are better than a DC/IX near the beach where water can wipe it all out. Preferably DC/IX should be on the 2nd or third floor IMHO on some islands.
>>>
>>> - J
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 4:11 PM Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>>> Some Caribbean islands had IXs in landing stations early on IIRC. Usually before the island built itâ€™s first datacenter.Some of them were better/faster about moving to the datacenter once it was established than others.Owen
>>>
>>>> On Nov 15, 2019, at 01:47 , Martijn Schmidt via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org> wrote:I think AMS-IX had an exchange in Mombasa in the SEACOM landing station at some point, but that is gone now. I'm not sure about the exact reasons there but someone here probably knows what happened.There's also a big amount of carriers in the TATA landing station in Mumbai, it is the second-largest in that market just behind GPX in terms of carrier density at least according to PeeringDB.Best regards,Martijn
>>>>
>>>> On 11/15/19 3:58 AM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey thereI have been putting my thoughts on Infrapedia blog and sharing with folks like https://www.infrapedia.com/post/top20cities-datacentersI am working on a new article and this time my topic will be looking at cable landing stations(cls). Do you consider cable landing stations as a datacenter? Do you have any experience deploying a pop in CLS? Are you able to share (on or off record) your experience which I can refer as your experience (good or bad) why deploying a pop inside a CLS is good or bad idea. Any additional comments..I am not a big fan of CLS deployments. They have limited networks ( like only carriers and no eyeballs) and very expensive connectivity (usually) Thank you in advance sharing your experience Mehmet --Mehmet+1-424-298-1903
>
> --
>
> Clayton Zekelman
> Managed Network Systems Inc. (MNSi)
> 3363 Tecumseh Rd. E
> Windsor, Ontario
> N8W 1H4
>
> tel. 519-985-8410
> fax. 519-985-8409
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20191115/268075fe/attachment.html>