Landing Stations used as datacenter

Fri Nov 15 23:20:31 UTC 2019

I would think that just a few extra fractions of a second from the cable
station to a DC/IX are better than a DC/IX near the beach where water can
wipe it all out. Preferably DC/IX should be on the 2nd or third floor IMHO
on some islands.

- J

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 4:11 PM Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:

> Some Caribbean islands had IXs in landing stations early on IIRC. Usually
> before the island built it’s first datacenter.
>
> Some of them were better/faster about moving to the datacenter once it was
> established than others.
>
> Owen
>
>
> On Nov 15, 2019, at 01:47 , Martijn Schmidt via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
> wrote:
>
> I think AMS-IX had an exchange in Mombasa in the SEACOM landing station at
> some point, but that is gone now. I'm not sure about the exact reasons
> there but someone here probably knows what happened.
>
> There's also a big amount of carriers in the TATA landing station in
> Mumbai, it is the second-largest in that market just behind GPX in terms of
> carrier density at least according to PeeringDB.
>
> Best regards,
> Martijn
>
> On 11/15/19 3:58 AM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>
> Hey there
>
> I have been putting my thoughts on Infrapedia blog and sharing with folks
> like
>
> https://www.infrapedia.com/post/top20cities-datacenters
>
> I am working on a new article and this time my topic will be looking at
> cable landing stations(cls). Do you consider cable landing stations as a
> datacenter? Do you have any experience deploying a pop in CLS? Are you able
> to share (on or off record) your experience which I can refer as your
> experience (good or bad) why deploying a pop inside a CLS is good or bad
> idea. Any additional comments..
>
> I am not a big fan of CLS deployments. They have limited networks ( like
> only carriers and no eyeballs) and very expensive connectivity (usually)
>
> Thank you in advance sharing your experience
>
> Mehmet
>
> --
> Mehmet
> +1-424-298-1903
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20191115/88a77774/attachment.html>