Spamming of NANOG list members
rgolodner at infratection.com
Thu May 23 21:39:33 UTC 2019
On 5/23/19 4:16 PM, Matt Harris wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 4:13 PM Hansen, Christoffer
> <christoffer at netravnen.de <mailto:christoffer at netravnen.de>> wrote:
> Appreciate the warning!
> On 23/05/2019 19:46, Valerie Wittkop wrote:
> > These messages are not flowing through NANOG servers, nor using
> the NANOG domain. They are not messages coming from the NANOG
> organization. Please be aware if you receive a message matching
> this description and always make sure to scan attachments for a virus.
> The one I received looked like this:
> > From: "NANOG" <service at cegips.pl <mailto:service at cegips.pl>>
> Has it been considered switching to "-all", instead of only "~all" in
> the spf record?
> > $ dig +short +nocmd +nocomments TXT nanog.org <http://nanog.org>
> > "v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com <http://spf.google.com>
> ip4:188.8.131.52 ip4:184.108.40.206 ip4:220.127.116.11
> ip4:18.104.22.168 ip6:2001:1838:2001:8::19 ip6:2001:1838:2001:8::20
> ip6:2400:cb00:2048:1::6814:c632 ip6:2400:cb00:2048:1::6814:c732 ~all"
> The SPF record wouldn't make a difference since that email was sent
> from @cegips.pl <http://cegips.pl>, not from @nanog.org
> <http://nanog.org>. You'd have to change the SPF record for the
> cegips.pl <http://cegips.pl> domain to impact their ability to send
> from that address.
The one I received was from _rainphil.com_ and came with an ugly Trojan
attached as a PDF.
Has anyone else received this type or am I just fortunate?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NANOG