Was wrong Re: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved?
Jon Lewis
jlewis at lewis.org
Thu Mar 28 21:48:44 UTC 2019
I think what you were remembering is Cogent/Google and Cogent/HE are both
IPv6 issues where the parties can't agree on peering vs transit for the v6
relationship.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, David Hubbard wrote:
>
> Oops, I was corrected that HE doesn’t have IPv6 issues with Google, not sure why I had that in my head. Cogent certainly does but something had me thinking there’s another big name
> that has the same problem.
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
> From: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> on behalf of David Hubbard <dhubbard at dino.hostasaurus.com>
> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2019 at 12:40 PM
> To: NANOG List <nanog at nanog.org>
> Subject: Did IPv6 between HE and Google ever get resolved?
>
>
>
> Hey all, I’ve been having bad luck searching around, but did IPv6 transit between HE and google ever get resolved? Ironically, I can now get to them cheaply from a location we
> currently have equipment that has been Cogent-only, so if it fixes the IPv6 issue I’d like to make the move. Anyone peer with HE in general and want to share their experience
> offlist? With the price, if they’re a good option, I’d consider rolling them in to other locations where we have redundancy already, so the v6 isn’t as big a deal there.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
| therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
More information about the NANOG
mailing list