residential.smb internet access in 2019 - help?

Wed Mar 27 13:46:27 UTC 2019

Good luck David.
Even up here in the Chicagoland Comcast footprint, I had a horror story when I moved into my home in 2002 wrt ATT.

Anyway, I’m not sure how far you are from Ocala, but they do offer residential internet via their municipal fiber.
https://www.ocalafl.org/government/city-departments/telecommunications/residential

$60/month for 300 Mbps…

-------

Greg Kovich
Director, Global Education Sales

Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise
ALE USA
3015 Abby Lane | Suite 301-B
Schererville, IN 46375
t:  +1-818-878-4667<tel:+1-818-878-4667>     m:  +1-219-276-2320<tel:+1-219-276-2320>
e:  Greg.Kovich at al-enterprise.com<mailto:greg.kovich at al-enterprise.com>    w:  www.al-enterprise.com<https://www.al-enterprise.com/en>
@ALUEnterprise
[LinkedIn]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/alcatellucententerprise>    [Twitter] <https://twitter.com/aluenterprise>   [YouTube] <https://www.youtube.com/user/EnterpriseALU>  [Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/ALUEnterprise>     [Rainbow] <https://web.openrainbow.com/app/1.31.7/index.html#/login>

[https://www.al-enterprise.com/en/-/media/assets/internet/images/logo.png]<https://www.al-enterprise.com/en>

The Alcatel-Lucent name and logo are trademarks of Nokia used under license by ALE.
This communication is intended to be received only by the individual or entity to whom or to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged/confidential or subject to copyright. Any unauthorized use, copying, review or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please delete this message from your e-mail box and information system (including all files and documents attached) and notify the sender by reply email.

On Mar 27, 2019, at 7:00 AM, nanog-request at nanog.org<mailto:nanog-request at nanog.org> wrote:

Message: 7
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 01:30:34 -0400
From: Ross Tajvar <ross at tajvar.io<mailto:ross at tajvar.io>>
To: Mike Bolitho <mikebolitho at gmail.com<mailto:mikebolitho at gmail.com>>
Cc: david raistrick <drais at icantclick.org<mailto:drais at icantclick.org>>,  "North American Network
       Operators' Group" <nanog at nanog.org<mailto:nanog at nanog.org>>
Subject: Re: residential/smb internet access in 2019 - help?
Message-ID:
       <CA+FDdDR-8teoFrGCuWGzN4WWdJv8ZgjsuKUFAMJ8Qo2m7C+wqw at mail.gmail.com<mailto:CA+FDdDR-8teoFrGCuWGzN4WWdJv8ZgjsuKUFAMJ8Qo2m7C+wqw at mail.gmail.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019, 12:30 AM Mike Bolitho <mikebolitho at gmail.com<mailto:mikebolitho at gmail.com>> wrote:

Agreed....this is why monopolies are bad and municipal fiber is good.

It's not like municipal fiber has some magic spell to make last mile
affordable though. On OP's instance he would run into the same issue and
would be paying that five figure amount to bring FTTP. Municipal fiber is
only good if you happen to live where a municipality has already buried
conduit.

I'm not saying we should support monopolistic practices, but "municipal
fiber everywhere!" isn't necessarily the answer either.

That's fair. What I really meant, and didn't take the time to think through
and express properly, was this: financing a large fiber buildout like it's
a long-term investment, rather than something that should make back its
capital cost in 1-3 years, gets fiber to more people. Most commercial ISPs
do not want to do this because they want immediate profit. Municipalities
are used to making long-term infrastructure investments (like bridges,
etc.) and are more amenable to doing it with fiber.

Even if there were a municipality which had done a fiber buildout near OP's
desired house, he may have still run into the same issue of no fiber being
close enough to be financially viable. But the more fiber plant there is,
the less likely that scenario becomes.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190327/e4b80326/attachment.html>