well-known Anycast prefixes

Ross Tajvar ross at tajvar.io
Thu Mar 21 16:52:27 UTC 2019


Not all any-casted prefixes are DNS resolvers and not all DNS resolvers are
anycasted. It sounds like you would be better served by a list of
well-known DNS resolvers.

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:35 PM Bryan Holloway <bryan at shout.net> wrote:

>
> On 3/21/19 10:59 AM, Frank Habicht wrote:
> > Hi James,
> >
> > On 20/03/2019 21:05, James Shank wrote:
> >> I'm not clear on the use cases, though.  What are the imagined use
> cases?
> >>
> >> It might make sense to solve 'a method to request hot potato routing'
> >> as a separate problem.  (Along the lines of Damian's point.)
> >
> > my personal reason/motivation is this:
> > Years ago I noticed that my traffic to the "I" DNS root server was
> > traversing 4 continents. That's from Tanzania, East Africa.
> > Not having a local instance (back then), we naturally sent the traffic
> > to an upstream. That upstream happens to be in that club of those who
> > don't have transit providers (which probably doesn't really matter, but
> > means a "global" network).
>
> /snip
>
> > Greetings,
> > Frank
> >
>
> I can think of another ...
>
> We rate-limit DNS from unknown quantities for reasons that should be
> obvious. We white-list traffic from known trusted (anycast) ones to
> prevent a DDoS attack from throttling legitimate queries. This would be
> a useful way to help auto-generate those ACLs.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190321/d4943c1f/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list