Arista Layer3 (Colton Conor)

Fri Mar 8 16:38:58 UTC 2019

I can't comment on the direct comparison of the SLX9540, but we have 8x
7280SR deployed across our network (just migrated off all the Brocades we
had) and have had amazing success with them.

The number of informational or "show" commands isn't as extensive as some
of the others that have been around for a while and the output of some of
them is a little jarring, but otherwise I have no complaints.

All of my BGP sessions (200-300 IX sessions, 2 transit providers, 28 iBGP)
are fully populated in <10 seconds (i know many of your networks are much
larger than ours).

As for pricing, I don't have list, but for the box, memory upgrade, and
routing license we paid much less than 100k -- Of course the port density

Feel free to reach out directly for more specific information :)

Mike

On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 7:00 AM <nanog-request at nanog.org> wrote:
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 21:44:34 -0600
From: Colton Conor <colton.conor at gmail.com>
To: "Kaiser, Erich" <erich at gotfusion.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Arista Layer3
Message-ID:
        <CAMDdSzOpE6Cnz+JUH=+31a2VGDcqQ5qi2nA16h8ethce1RxfvQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

So how does the  7280SR-48C6 compare to the  SLX9540? They are the same
Broadcom chipset right? So the real question, is how does the product
differ in software?

On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 10:58 AM Kaiser, Erich <erich at gotfusion.net> wrote:

> Agreed.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 2:16 AM Brandon Martin <lists.nanog at monmotha.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/6/19 12:36 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
>> > How much do these boxes cost?
>>
>> List is about $100k in North America for a 9640 with all the ports
>> "unlocked", full hardware kit (PSUs, fans, etc.) and some
>> maintenance/support.  Take whatever your standard Brocade/Extreme
>> discount from that tends to look like.  I should hope nobody pays list
>> or anywhere close.
>> --
>> Brandon Martin
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190308/3f1cdd4c/attachment.html>