Arista Layer3

Wed Mar 6 05:36:13 UTC 2019

How much do these boxes cost?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 5:24 PM Kaiser, Erich <erich at gotfusion.net> wrote:

> It would be worth your time to look at Extreme SLX9640 with advanced
> routing license.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:47 PM Roel Parijs <roel.parijs at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We have been using the 7280SR-48C6 for 2.5 years now. Just after Arista
>> announced the full table BGP routing.
>> Looking at the price / port there is nothing near Arista. We also use
>> Cisco ASR1K and Juniper MX204 but these have far less capacity.
>>
>> When we first started, there were quite a few features missing but over
>> the past 2 year they have really been catching up. I was very happy when
>> they added MSS clamping at the end of last year.
>>
>> The new version 7280R2K should be able to handle 2M routes.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 9:31 PM <nanog at jack.fr.eu.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Check out the 7280sr2k, which is actually 24*10G, 24*25G, 6*100G
>>>
>>> On 03/05/2019 08:55 PM, David Hubbard wrote:
>>> > I love the NCS5501, but once Arista gets the 2M-route capacity down
>>> into the 48x10g format, I'd jump ship in a heartbeat; currently you have to
>>> do a much larger chassis-based device or their 100gig 7280 to have that
>>> route scale.  My big gripes with the 5501 are that, due to its
>>> architecture, if you want to do uRPF, you chop your route scale in half,
>>> even on the 5501-SE.  5501 also has no supported configuration where you
>>> have both first hop redundancy and physical path redundancy, because you
>>> can't do both VRRP (its only redundant first hop option) and BVI's, can't
>>> do MC-LAG, can't do vPC, so you need switches in addition to the 5501's if
>>> that's the goal..
>>> >
>>> > David
>>> >
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190305/8d822891/attachment.html>