AS16509 (Amazon) peering contact

Fri Jun 28 20:33:53 UTC 2019

Good luck we are the 9th largest MSO and still have not gotten a response back from Amazon.

-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Fultpn
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 3:50 PM
To: Kody Vicknair <kvicknair at reservetele.com>; nanog at nanog.org
Subject: RE: AS16509 (Amazon) peering contact

Hi Kody,

Contact information on PeeringDB is not normally accessible without an account and that information is not indexed by search engines, unlike this and other mailing lists.

My point remains if you want to share a non-role contact, especially for someone at an organization as large as Amazon, due so privately.  Otherwise such contacts might become so bogged down by the increased amount of email from world plus dog, they no longer are able to be as helpful or prompt.  
Alternatively, you could ask the person whose contact you wish to share publicly for consent first.  If you did, my apologies.

On June 28, 2019 15:03:13 Kody Vicknair <kvicknair at reservetele.com> wrote:

> No private information was shared.
>
> See for yourself:
> https://www.peeringdb.com/net/1418
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Stephen 
> Fulton
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 5:22 PM
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: AS16509 (Amazon) peering contact
>
> Hi Kody,
>
> Please don't share a person's e-mail account on a mailing list.Â  Role 
> accounts are one thing, but not this.Â  If you want to, send it 
> privately.Â
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stephen
>
> On 2019-06-27 17:47, Kody Vicknair wrote:
>> I've always worked with Tim Bates. They were exceptionally quick with 
>> standing up my session. like same day quick...
>>
>> xxx at amazon.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Kody Vicknair
>> Network Engineer
>>
>> Tel:    985.536.1214
>> Fax:    985.536.0300
>> Email:  kvicknair at reservetele.com
>>
>> Reserve Telecommunications
>> 100 RTC Dr
>> Reserve, LA 70084
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> _
>> ___________________________
>>
>> Disclaimer:
>> The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only 
>> for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
>> confidential and/or privileged material which should not disseminate, 
>> distribute or be copied. Please notify Kody Vicknair immediately by 
>> e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this 
>> e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to 
>> be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, 
>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain 
>> viruses. Kody Vicknair therefore does not accept liability for any 
>> errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. .
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org] On Behalf Of Hansen, 
>> Christoffer
>> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 2:45 PM
>> To: nanog at nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: AS16509 (Amazon) peering contact
>>
>>
>> On 27/06/2019 20:55, Andras Toth wrote:
>>> Including at least an ASN in the peering request usually helps to 
>>> expedite the process :)
>> & keeping your peeringdb entry up-to-date is usually helpful, too.
>> Depending on who you want to peer with(!)
>>
>> Some networks require you to have up-to-date peeringdb information 
>> for your network. Including which facilities and/or internet 
>> exchanges you are either connected to and/or present on/in.
>> This will often be the case if $peering_partner have either partial 
>> or fully automated peering configuration management.
>>
>> /Christoffer