provider email maintenance standard

Doug Royer douglasroyer at gmail.com
Mon Jun 17 15:53:36 UTC 2019


Why not submit this as a draft to the IETF and make it an official 
extension?



On 6/17/19 7:25 AM, Martin Pels wrote:
> https://www.facebook.com/groups/maintnote/
> 
> On 17/06/19 15:14, Andrew Dampf wrote:
>> Hello nanog,
>>
>> I've heard second-hand there is an existing standard for provider
>> maintenance emails that should be followed in the form of a calendar
>> attachment, but I can't seem to find any information on it. Can anyone
>> help me with the following:
>>
>> 1. Does this standard exist? If so, is there somewhere I can read more
>> about it?
>> 2. How many providers follow this standard?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>


-- 

Doug Royer - (http://DougRoyer.US)
Douglas.Royer at gmail.com
714-989-6135

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4005 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190617/42f267e2/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list