CenturyLink/Level 3 combined AS

Filip Hruska fhr at fhrnet.eu
Sat Jun 8 14:40:23 UTC 2019


Cogent and "great" don't belong in one sentence in my opinion. It's usable though and their pricing is (if you push hard enough) simply unbeatable.

I would pick L3 any day over Cogent if the pricing was the same. 

Kind Regards,
Filip Hruska

On 8 June 2019 3:36:26 pm GMT+02:00, David Hubbard <dhubbard at dino.hostasaurus.com> wrote:
>Cogent is great, or worthless, depending on whether you like talking to
>Google via IPv6.
>
>From: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> on behalf of Darin Steffl
><darin.steffl at mnwifi.com>
>Date: Saturday, June 8, 2019 at 9:10 AM
>To: Brielle Bruns <bruns at 2mbit.com>
>Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog at nanog.org>
>Subject: Re: CenturyLink/Level 3 combined AS
>
>Ok just so simplify things.
>
>Is Cogent or CenturyLink/L3 better for transit?
>
>On Fri, Jun 7, 2019, 3:00 PM Brielle Bruns
><bruns at 2mbit.com<mailto:bruns at 2mbit.com>> wrote:
>On 6/7/2019 11:03 AM, Romeo Czumbil wrote:
>> All new CL Internet get's provisioned on AS3356
>> You would need a strong case for them to put you on AS209
>
>
>Got provisioned last year on AS209 when they turned up my ent Fiber
>with
>BGP.
>
>Could depend heavily on what services and where.
>
>--
>Brielle Bruns
>The Summit Open Source Development Group
>http://www.sosdg.org    /     http://www.ahbl.org

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190608/2392996f/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list