User Unknown (WAS: really amazon?)

Wed Jul 31 12:34:51 UTC 2019

On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 16:02:58 +0300, Töma Gavrichenkov said:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:20 PM Christoffer Hansen <christoffer at netravnen.de> wrote:
> > Imagine ARIN did a take from RIPE NCC [Policy Proposal Idea?] and a
> > policy came into effect of validating ALL 'OrgAbuseEmail' objects listed
> > in the ARIN database.
>
> Just to be precise, such a policy (2019-04) is still in a discussion
> phase in RIPE and has already seen significant resistance.

OK, I'll bite.  What reasons are they giving for their resistance? (And if known,
what are the *real* reasons if different?)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190731/b95ccd26/attachment.sig>