Feasibility of using Class E space for public unicast (was re: 44/8)

Stephen Satchell list at satchell.net
Sat Jul 27 22:07:55 UTC 2019


On 7/27/19 2:18 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> something is broken on the nanog list.  usually we have this discussion
> twice a year.  this time it may have been a couple of years gap.  what
> broke?


44/8.  Sucked up all the oxygen.



More information about the NANOG mailing list