44/8

Scott Weeks surfer at mauigateway.com
Tue Jul 23 00:39:08 UTC 2019


> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:02 PM Jerry Cloe <jerry at jtcloe.net> wrote:
>
> > There's already widespread use (abuse ?) of DOD /8's.
> > T-Mobile commonly assigns 26/8 space (and others) to
> > customers and nat's it.


> --- cb.list6 at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Ca By <cb.list6 at gmail.com>
>
> My understanding is that is not currently commonly the
> case
> https://www.worldipv6launch.org/apps/ipv6week/measurement/images/graphs/T-MobileUSA.png
> ---------------------------------------------------


On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:31 PM Scott Weeks <surfer at mauigateway.com> wrote:
> Did they renumber (IPv4) out of that space?  Or are 
> they just not continuing to expand into it?


--- cb.list6 at gmail.com wrote:
From: Ca By <cb.list6 at gmail.com>

They stopped using ipv4 assigned for handsets for most 
cases with 464xlat
<snip>
--------------------------------------


Ah, OK.  I didn't realize they were just using it for handsets.  I
thought the address space was used elsewhere.  When orgs do this the
ugliness of squatting sticks to the org seemingly forever like stink 
on sh!+

scott



More information about the NANOG mailing list