Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Fri Jul 19 03:02:40 UTC 2019

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:59 PM Majdi S. Abbas <msa at latt.net> wrote:
>         What's interesting about this is it was not an ARIN allocation,

So.. this is/was a legacy allocation, right?  with some 'not great'
contact/etc info...
the ARIN folk could have said: "Well.... sure! if the current folk who
control access can positively show they do AND they don't mind parting
with a /10... ok?"

This ends up with a /10 of a /8 with better registration information
and MAYBE better records keeping over time, right?
that seems like a win to the ARIN community?

More information about the NANOG mailing list