QoS for Office365

Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu
Tue Jul 9 14:37:50 UTC 2019


On Tue, 09 Jul 2019 17:16:52 +0300, Saku Ytti said:

> In previous life working with L3 MPLS VPN with deliveries far
> exceeding on-net size we bought access from partners and had QoS
> contracts in place, which were tested and enforced and they worked
> after some ironing during field trials.

I'll bite.

It's one thing to verify that no routers molested the QoS bits along the
packet path.

But how did you verify they "worked" as far as actually dropping packets off
the correct flow (especially since if you have a high-priority QoS, the flow that
loses may be some other customer's flow)?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190709/7edd76dd/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list