Calling LinkedIn, Amazon and Akamai @ DE-CIX NY

Wed Jan 30 22:09:40 UTC 2019

Hi Thomas,

You probably should remove sessions with networks explicitly *not*
participating in route servers versus displaying them on a global shame
list.

Cheers, -ren

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:06 PM Thomas King <thomas.king at de-cix.net> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your support! This helps us getting all peers on the new IPv4
> space.
>
>
>
> Our looking glass shows which peers already have changed the IP settings
> (see section “BGP session established”) and which peers are still working
> on it (see section “BGP sessions down”):
>
> https://lg.de-cix.net/routeservers/rs1_nyc_ipv4#sessions-up
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> on behalf of James Stankiewicz <
> stankiewicz at njedge.net>
> *Date: *Wednesday, 30. January 2019 at 19:32
> *To: *Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net>
> *Cc: *North American Network Operators' Group <nanog at nanog.org>
> *Subject: *Re: Calling LinkedIn, Amazon and Akamai @ DE-CIX NY
>
>
>
> Microsoft an Edgecast has not yet made there changes.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:20 PM Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net>
> wrote:
>
> Akamai is working on doing our part. Apologies.
>
> Sent from my iCar
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2019, at 12:02 PM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet at akcin.net> wrote:
>
> Pinged my contacts in each
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 05:52 Jason Lixfeld <jason+nanog at lixfeld.ca>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In late October 2018, DE-CIX announced that they would be renumbering
> their IPv4 address block in New York between 01-28-19 and 01-30-19.
>
> This was followed by numerous reminders in months, weeks and even days
> leading up to the renumbering activity.
>
> The renumbering activity has come and gone, but LinkedIn, Amazon and
> Akamai are still using the old IPs.
>
> If three months has gone by and the numerous reminders that have been sent
> have resulted in these organizations still living on the old IP space, it
> seems to me that there may be some sort of a disconnect between who
> receives the notifications from IXPs and how they are filtered upstream.
>
> I’m hopeful that the eyeballs who read this list are some of those folks
> who should have received the notifications from DE-CIX, or can at least
> filter the info back downstream to whoever can perform the renumbering
> activity.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
>
> Mehmet
> +1-424-298-1903
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Jim Stankiewicz*
>
> *Principal Network Architect*
>
> *NJEdge*
>
> *W:855.832.EDGE(3343)*
>
> *c:201.306.4409*
>
> *[image:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B15Cb24EwZVsOUhIa0lWbG9ZT2c&revid=0B15Cb24EwZVsdVB2SlJ3ekFEUllPRDZyMGZ5cUtkbko2bWQ0PQ]*
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190130/dfe8b00f/attachment.html>