BGP Experiment

Eric Kuhnke eric.kuhnke at gmail.com
Wed Jan 23 17:53:07 UTC 2019


I would be very interested in hearing Ben's definition of something that is
"massive", if announcing or withdrawing a single /24 from the global
routing table constitutes, quote, "a massive prefix spike/flap".

Individual /24s are moved around all the time by fully automated systems.


On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:42 AM Job Snijders <job at ntt.net> wrote:

> Dear Ben, all,
>
> I'm not sure this experiment should be canceled. On the public Internet
> we MUST assume BGP speakers are compliant with the BGP-4 protocol.
> Broken BGP-4 speakers are what they are: broken. They must be fixed, or
> the operator must accept the consequences.
>
> "Get a sandbox like every other researcher" is not a fair statement, one
> can also posit "Get a compliant BGP-4 implementation like every other
> network operator".
>
> When bad guys explicitly seek to target these Asian and Australian
> operators you reference (who apparently have not upgraded to the vendor
> recommended release), using *valid* BGP updates, will a politely emailed
> request help resolve the situation? Of course not!
>
> Stopping the experiment is only treating symptoms, the root cause must
> be addressed: broken software.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Job
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:19:09PM -0500, Italo Cunha wrote:
> > Ben, NANOG,
> >
> > We have canceled this experiment permanently.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:00 PM Ben Cooper <ben at packet.gg> wrote:
> >
> > > Can you stop this?
> > >
> > > You caused again a massive prefix spike/flap, and as the internet is
> not
> > > centered around NA (shock horror!) a number of operators in Asia and
> > > Australia go effected by your “expirment” and had no idea what was
> > > happening or why.
> > >
> > > Get a sandbox like every other researcher, as of now we have black
> holed
> > > and filtered your whole ASN, and have reccomended others do the same.
> > >
> > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 1:19 am, Italo Cunha <cunha at dcc.ufmg.br> wrote:
> > >
> > >> NANOG,
> > >>
> > >> This is a reminder that this experiment will resume tomorrow
> > >> (Wednesday, Jan. 23rd). We will announce 184.164.224.0/24 carrying a
> > >> BGP attribute of type 0xff (reserved for development) between 14:00
> > >> and 14:15 GMT.
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:05 AM Italo Cunha <cunha at dcc.ufmg.br>
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > NANOG,
> > >> >
> > >> > We would like to inform you of an experiment to evaluate
> alternatives
> > >> > for speeding up adoption of BGP route origin validation (research
> > >> > paper with details [A]).
> > >> >
> > >> > Our plan is to announce prefix 184.164.224.0/24 with a valid
> > >> > standards-compliant unassigned BGP attribute from routers operated
> by
> > >> > the PEERING testbed [B, C]. The attribute will have flags 0xe0
> > >> > (optional transitive [rfc4271, S4.3]), type 0xff (reserved for
> > >> > development), and size 0x20 (256bits).
> > >> >
> > >> > Our collaborators recently ran an equivalent experiment with no
> > >> > complaints or known issues [A], and so we do not anticipate any
> > >> > arising. Back in 2010, an experiment using unassigned attributes by
> > >> > RIPE and Duke University caused disruption in Internet routing due
> to
> > >> > a bug in Cisco routers [D, CVE-2010-3035]. Since then, this and
> other
> > >> > similar bugs have been patched [e.g., CVE-2013-6051], and new BGP
> > >> > attributes have been assigned (BGPsec-path) and adopted (large
> > >> > communities). We have successfully tested propagation of the
> > >> > announcements on Cisco IOS-based routers running versions
> 12.2(33)SRA
> > >> > and 15.3(1)S, Quagga 0.99.23.1 and 1.1.1, as well as BIRD 1.4.5 and
> > >> > 1.6.3.
> > >> >
> > >> > We plan to announce 184.164.224.0/24 from 8 PEERING locations for a
> > >> > predefined period of 15 minutes starting 14:30 GMT, from Monday to
> > >> > Thursday, between the 7th and 22nd of January, 2019 (full schedule
> and
> > >> > locations [E]). We will stop the experiment immediately in case any
> > >> > issues arise.
> > >> >
> > >> > Although we do not expect the experiment to cause disruption, we
> > >> > welcome feedback on its safety and especially on how to make it
> safer.
> > >> > We can be reached at disco-experiment at googlegroups.com.
> > >> >
> > >> > Amir Herzberg, University of Connecticut
> > >> > Ethan Katz-Bassett, Columbia University
> > >> > Haya Shulman, Fraunhofer SIT
> > >> > Ítalo Cunha, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
> > >> > Michael Schapira, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
> > >> > Tomas Hlavacek, Fraunhofer SIT
> > >> > Yossi Gilad, MIT
> > >> >
> > >> > [A] https://conferences.sigcomm.org/hotnets/2018/program.html
> > >> > [B] http://peering.usc.edu
> > >> > [C] https://goo.gl/AFR1Cn
> > >> > [D]
> > >>
> https://labs.ripe.net/Members/erik/ripe-ncc-and-duke-university-bgp-experiment
> > >> > [E] https://goo.gl/nJhmx1
> > >>
> > > --
> > > Ben Cooper
> > > Chief Executive Officer
> > > PacketGG - Multicast
> > > M(Telstra): 0410 411 301
> > > M(Optus):  0434 336 743
> > > E: ben at packet.gg & ben at multicast.net.au
> > > W: https://packet.gg
> > > W: https://multicast.net.au
> > >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "DISCO Experiment" group.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an
> > > email to disco-experiment+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> > > To post to this group, send email to disco-experiment at googlegroups.com
> .
> > > To view this discussion on the web visit
> > >
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/disco-experiment/CAPZQKs8aVT%3D7gJdGcoC-KOPDR0F4Ms33KAKKG5-4k96SVCSFEw%40mail.gmail.com
> > > <
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/disco-experiment/CAPZQKs8aVT%3D7gJdGcoC-KOPDR0F4Ms33KAKKG5-4k96SVCSFEw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
> >
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> > >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190123/de495b38/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list