SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]
Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
giri at dombox.org
Mon Jan 14 15:31:29 UTC 2019
Because I saw support from people like Alessandro Vesely for my proposal.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/pSb216OGLuTe31yUzAXtqD2haAo
Then it hit me. Maybe more people like him interested in SMTPS too. So I
have done some research and posted this comment.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-smtp/apZ8nBnGpv1aXlFUtbcTjGipA8Q
When I open this thread, I just wanted to make sure we are all on the same
page. I think I even mentioned what IETF thinks when I created this thread.
And asked "I would love to know where you stand on this proposal."
So I opened this thread, just to collect some feedback.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 8:45 PM Doug Royer <douglasroyer at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/11/19 10:38 AM, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote:
> > Hello NANOG, Belated new year wishes.
> >
> > I would like to gather some feedback from you all.
> >
> > I'm trying to propose two things to the Internet Standard and it's
> > related to SMTP.
>
> Your post to this list was (according to the headers):
> 11 Jan 2019 23:08:21 +0530
>
> Yet on the IETF-smtp mailing list at:
> Wed, 9 Jan 2019 12:29:43 +0530
>
> *You* wrote (in part):
> I'm the guy who proposed SMTP Over TLS on Port 26. Looks like that was
> dead end. So, now coming with another proposal.
>
> Question: Why did you post something on NANOG that you already declared
> to the IETF yourself as a "dead end" 2 days earlier? I read all of the
> IETF emails on this idea. They explained why it is currently a
> no-starter as proposed.
>
> --
>
> Doug Royer - (http://DougRoyer.US http://goo.gl/yrxJTu )
> DouglasRoyer at gmail.com
> 714-989-6135
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
Dombox, Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190114/9e5f72b2/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list