yet another round of SMTP Over TLS on Port 26 - Implicit TLS Proposal [Feedback Request]

Sat Jan 12 23:21:40 UTC 2019

I don't know why you are all try to defend a man who try to silence my work.

Are you saying this thread is necessary?

On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 4:46 AM Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 12:51 AM Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
> <giri at dombox.org> wrote:
> > 5 months back I posted my spam research on DMARC list.
> > You have gone through only 50 words and judged my work.
> > The whole thread gone haywire because of you. I was
> > humiliated there and left.
>
> By the way, since that you've left no traces of whatever piece of work
> you've posted to that list. The website is empty, slides are removed
> from Speakerdeck, etc.
>
> In theory, I can easily recall a few cases in my life when going
> through just 50 words was quite enough for a judgment.
>
> > To be very honest, I don't like you.
>
> Please keep our busy mailing list out of this information, though for
> me it's a valuable piece of data that someone I don't know personally
> doesn't like someone else.
>
> > Although I don't like you, I still managed to respond politely in
> > IETF lists. Again... In that list the only thing you did was
> > attacking my work.
>
> So, I've read the whole thread, and, as far as I can see, there was
> nothing coming from John except for a balanced judgement.
>
> > And then please tell me this man is not biased at all.
>
> Sorry, he's not.
>
> --
> Töma
>

-- 
Best Regards,

Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan
Dombox, Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190113/ae0d5bcf/attachment.html>