Service Provider NetFlow Collectors
H I Baysal
hibaysal at gmail.com
Wed Jan 2 12:37:29 UTC 2019
Hi Tim,
That absolutely depends on the amount of TAGs you use, and how you
aggregate, etc.
I am collecting DSTAS, SRCAS, en DST AS per IP. And influx is not even
sweating a single drop....
We have a 4 Tbps of traffic during peak, and as well as pmacct and
influxdb or running very very smooth.
(With the mentioned aggregations I can see what a single customer costs
with Transit, Peering and IX (per IP even if needed) )
And dst AS per port/description/ethernet name
From your mail i derive that you just pushed everything to influx from
flows, you have to be a bit smarter with the layout, aggregations and
continuous queries.
(collect what you need)
On 02-01-19 13:08, Tim Raphael wrote:
> I would advise against InfluxDB in this case - flow data has a very
> high (and open) tag cardinality which is not suited to Influx
> (although their recently new index format has improved this).
>
> I’m currently pushing sFlow through Pmacct —> Kafka —> Clickhouse
> (columnar store) with a summing merge tree database engine.
> Clickhouse is very fast for queries across columns as well as
> aggregating down them (e.g. summing number of bytes).
>
> For example this is the results of a query of nearly a year’s worth of
> MAC-to-MAC flows (7-tuple) queried for the last 7 days between two
> given sets of MACs:
> /
> /
> /2016 rows in set. Elapsed: 0.208 sec. Processed 17.56 million rows,
> 1.03 GB (84.51 million rows/s., 4.97 GB/s.)/
> /
> /
> There is also a Grafana datasource plugin for Clickhouse :)
> /
> /
> /- /Tim
>
>
>> On 2 Jan 2019, at 7:50 pm, H I Baysal <hibaysal at gmail.com
>> <mailto:hibaysal at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> PMACCT (Works Awesome)
>> push to influxdb ( Works awesome)
>>
>> With some custom scripts to add/match interface descriptions. And you
>> can query whatever you want in grafana :D
>> And grafana has a nice API for rendering a dashboardgraph to a PNG
>> and you can send this png to whatever chat/bot or mail you want.
>>
>> And all for free with 99% of accuracy.
>>
>> (Mucho gracias to Paulo :D )
>>
>>
>> On 01-01-19 05:56, Avi Freedman wrote:
>>> We do have a minimum for commercial service that's more like
>>> $1500/mo but we are coming out with a free tier in Q1 with lower
>>> retention (among other deltas, but including fully slice and dice
>>> flow analytics +BGP that it sounded like Erik might be looking for).
>>>
>>> Feel free to ping me if anyone would like to help us test the free
>>> tier in January.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Avi Freedman
>>> CEO, Kentik
>>>
>>>> Doesn't Kentik cost like $2000 a month minimum?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 11:57 AM Matthew Crocker
>>>> <matthew at corp.crocker.com <mailto:matthew at corp.crocker.com>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 Kentik as well, DDoS, RTBH, Netflow. Cloud based so I don't
>>>>> have to
>>>>> worry about it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/31/18, 11:37 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Bryan Holloway" <
>>>>> nanog-bounces at nanog.org <mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org> on behalf
>>>>> of bryan at shout.net <mailto:bryan at shout.net>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 Kentik ...
>>>>>
>>>>> We've been using their DDoS/RTBH mitigation with good success.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/31/18 3:52 AM, Eric Lindsjö wrote:
>>>>> > Hi,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > We use kentik and we're very happy. Works great, tons of new
>>>>> features
>>>>> > coming along all the time. Going to start looking into ddos
>>>>> detection
>>>>> > and mitigation soon.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Would recommend.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Kind regards,
>>>>> > Eric Lindsjö
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 12/31/2018 04:29 AM, Erik Sundberg wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Hi Nanog….
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> We are looking at replacing our Netflow collector. I am
>>>>> wonder what
>>>>> >> other service providers are using to collect netflow data
>>>>> off their
>>>>> >> Core and Edge Routers. Pros/Cons… What to watch out for any
>>>>> info
>>>>> would
>>>>> >> help.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> We are mainly looking to analyze the netflow data. Bonus if
>>>>> it does
>>>>> >> ddos detection and mitigation.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> We are looking at
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> ManageEngine Netflow Analyzer
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> PRTG
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Plixer – Scrutinizer
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> PeakFlow
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Kentik
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Solarwinds NTA
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Thanks in advance…
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Erik
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any
>>>>> documents,
>>>>> >> files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain
>>>>> >> confidential information that is legally privileged. If you
>>>>> are not
>>>>> >> the intended recipient, or a person responsible for
>>>>> delivering it
>>>>> to
>>>>> >> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>>>>> disclosure,
>>>>> >> copying, distribution or use of any of the information
>>>>> contained in
>>>>> or
>>>>> >> attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If
>>>>> you have
>>>>> >> received this transmission in error please notify the sender
>>>>> >> immediately by replying to this e-mail. You must destroy the
>>>>> original
>>>>> >> transmission and its attachments without reading or saving
>>>>> in any
>>>>> >> manner. Thank you.
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190102/64f222ef/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list