Latency question - Juniper MX960 vs the Tellabs 8860
Steve Danello
the76posse at gmail.com
Wed Feb 13 18:32:51 UTC 2019
Yes thank you Saku! We’ve accounted for the fiber distance. We just want to be able to quote the hardware latency. Thanks for verifying that Juniper; just need the Tellabs... thank you:)
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 12:53 PM, Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:
>
> Hey Steve,
>
> 15us would be more than you'll realistically see in uncongested MX960,
> but it is in the ball-bark. I've not tried Tellabs, if customer is
> latency sensitive you probably want to look constant time pipeline
> devices rather than run to completion npus. You'll see low single
> digit us on typical box. Remember that 10us is just 2km of fibre (1km
> of RTT).
>
>
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:28 PM Steve Danello <the76posse at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Looking for two latency profiles, best/worst cast would be great for the Telllabs 8860 and Juniper MX960. Looks like the Juniper may be in the 15us range
>>
>> Both cases would be a 10Gb -1Gb and 1Gb - 10Gb
>>
>> We’d understand the serialization piece; really looking to provide a customer the hardware latency, we don’t have a great means to test them
>>
>> Thanks all!
>>
>> Steve
>
>
>
> --
> ++ytti
More information about the NANOG
mailing list