Last Mile Design
Miles Fidelman
mfidelman at meetinghouse.net
Sat Feb 9 20:28:22 UTC 2019
There is that.
On 2/9/19 3:27 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> The biggest use of bandwidth as the IoT buzzword comes to fruition is
> exploits.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp><https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From: *"Miles Fidelman" <mfidelman at meetinghouse.net>
> *To: *"Mike Hammett" <nanog at ics-il.net>
> *Cc: *nanog at nanog.org
> *Sent: *Saturday, February 9, 2019 2:26:13 PM
> *Subject: *Re: Last Mile Design
>
> I expect things are going to change as IoT takes off - security
> cameras, baby monitors, start to push video upstream - that makes a
> difference.
>
>
> And then there are the efforts of cell carriers to push traffic onto
> home wifi - more and more facetime video will also add load.
>
>
> Miles
>
>
> On 2/9/19 3:14 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> Electrical consumption of the equipment is different and then the
> environmental conditioning that larger electronic load.
>
> Let's not forget that actual consumer bit consumption changes very
> little whether they have 20 megs or 2 gigs provisioned and available.
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp><https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From: *"Miles Fidelman" <mfidelman at meetinghouse.net>
> *To: *nanog at nanog.org
> *Sent: *Saturday, February 9, 2019 12:20:36 PM
> *Subject: *Re: Last Mile Design
>
> Speaking of which, the Grant County Public Utility District
> (Washington
> State), has wired active ethernet all over their rural county.
>
> Seems to me that the cost difference between splitters & switches
> is a
> pretty minor component of deploying FTTH - the costs are in the
> trenching, and the fiber. What you put on the poles, or in the lawn
> furniture, is a pretty minor cost component. Though... getting
> power to
> the switches might be an issue, less so if you're deploying on
> power poles.
>
> Miles Fidelman
>
> On 2/9/19 12:59 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Feb 2019, Mark Tinka wrote:
> >
> >> If I had to build a consumer broadband network and had the budget
> >> (and owned the fibre) to do so, I'd definitely always choose
> Active-E:
> >
> > For anyone saying it's "impossible" to do AE they're welcome
> here to
> > the nordic region and especially Sweden where PON is basically
> unheard
> > of. We have millions of AE connected households. I live in one
> of them.
> >
> --
> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
> In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
>
>
> --
> In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
> In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
>
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190209/6e537061/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list