RTBH no_export

Michel Py michel.py at tsisemi.com
Fri Feb 1 03:13:08 UTC 2019

> Alejandro Acosta wrote :
> One more thing, RFC7999 has category Informational

Point well taken.
A good thing, IMHO. If I remember correctly, I once opposed this text; not because it was a bad idea (standardizing is sometimes a good idea) but because I found it imprecise enough that it was not achieveing any goal and blurred the definition of what is a RTBH.


TSI Disclaimer:  This message and any files or text attached to it are intended only for the recipients named above and contain information that may be confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not forward, copy, use or otherwise disclose this communication or the information contained herein. In the event you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, and then delete all copies of it from your system. Thank you!...

More information about the NANOG mailing list