Starting to Drop Invalids for Customers
Christopher Morrow
morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Wed Dec 11 03:45:20 UTC 2019
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 7:32 PM Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> RPKI ROAs (compared to IRR objects) carry different meaning: the existence of a ROA (both by definition and common implementation) supersedes other data sources (IRR, LOAs, or comments in whois records, etc), and as such can be used on any type of EBGP session for validation of the received Internet routing information.
>>
>
> Which brings me to my favorite possible RPKI-IRR integration: a ROA that says that IRR objects on IRR source x with maintainer Y are authoritative for a given number resource. Kinda like SPF for BGP.
>
Is this required? or a crutch for use until a network can publish all
of their routing data in the RPKI?
-chris
More information about the NANOG
mailing list