Software Defined Networks
Jennifer Rexford
jrex at cs.princeton.edu
Thu Dec 5 02:41:04 UTC 2019
SDN is definitely an overloaded and confusing term that is used inconsistently. Here are a few attempts to explain:
- “The Road to SDN: An Intellectual History of Programmable Networks” (ACM Queue, December 2013)
https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2560327 <https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2560327>
- “Abstractions for Software-Defined Networks” (CACM, October 2014)
http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~jnfoster/papers/sdn-abstractions.pdf <http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~jnfoster/papers/sdn-abstractions.pdf>
- “From Ethane to SDN and Beyond” (ACM SIGCOMM CCR, October 2019)
https://ccronline.sigcomm.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/acmdl19-347.pdf <https://ccronline.sigcomm.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/acmdl19-347.pdf>
— Jen
> On Dec 4, 2019, at 12:56 PM, Rod Beck <rod.beck at unitedcablecompany.com> wrote:
>
> Can someone explain what is all the fuss? SDN is like the latest telecom craze but the articles do a poor job of explaining the advantages. I seek concrete examples.
>
> Regards,
>
> Roderick.
>
>
> Roderick Beck
> VP of Business Development
> United Cable Company
> www.unitedcablecompany.com <http://www.unitedcablecompany.com/>
> New York City & Budapest
> rod.beck at unitedcablecompany.com <mailto:rod.beck at unitedcablecompany.com>
> 36-70-605-5144
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20191204/15a7e86c/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list