RIPE our of IPv4

Tue Dec 3 02:31:56 UTC 2019

On Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:04:24 -0800, Fred Baker said:

> > I believe that Dmitry's point is that we will still require IPv4 addresses for new
> > organizations deploying dual-stack
>
> I think I understood what you meant, but not what you said.

> If someone is dual stack, they are IPv6-capable and IPv4-capable.

And they're going to need v4 addresses to be v4-capable, aren't there?

A new corporation that's trying to spin up dual-stack is going to need 2
address allocations, a v4 and a v6.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20191202/72a6d546/attachment.sig>