Looking for a Google contact (peering frustrations)

Jon Sands fohdeesha at gmail.com
Wed Aug 28 01:08:35 UTC 2019


It seems they accidentally stopped sending any prefixes at all to the 
IIX and we were somehow the only ones to notice - that's been fixed. 
Also was offered a cache appliance since we're approaching near 10gbps 
of youtube traffic. Very happy with how it turned out

On 8/27/2019 8:35 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
> What was the outcome?
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019, 8:35 PM Jon Sands <fohdeesha at gmail.com 
> <mailto:fohdeesha at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Fixed off list by (several) google employees. Thanks!
>
>     On 8/26/2019 10:52 PM, Jon Sands wrote:
>     > AS397031 here, located in Telehouse (7 Teleport). We picked up a
>     port
>     > on NYIIX specifically to peer with google and cloudflare. We were
>     > doing around 6gbps inbound from google over the NYIIX for some time
>     > then without warning google withdrew routes from us, I'm guessing
>     > because too much bandwidth over an IIX and they prefer a private
>     > interconnect at that point. So we requested to peer with them via a
>     > PNI and were denied, saying they can't do that either as they're
>     not
>     > located in any Telehouse buildings. So I'm left with no Google
>     peering
>     >
>     > A 10gb wave from where we are to the nearest google peering
>     point is
>     > basically the same cost as 10gbps from HE, so trying to figure
>     out my
>     > best options here. Open to suggestions! Ideally we would love to
>     peer
>     > with google again over NYIIX if possible.
>     >
>
>     -- 
>     Jon Sands
>     MFI Labs
>     https://fohdeesha.com/
>

-- 
Jon Sands
MFI Labs
https://fohdeesha.com/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190827/39cf46ad/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list