Looking for a Google contact (peering frustrations)
Jon Sands
fohdeesha at gmail.com
Wed Aug 28 01:08:35 UTC 2019
It seems they accidentally stopped sending any prefixes at all to the
IIX and we were somehow the only ones to notice - that's been fixed.
Also was offered a cache appliance since we're approaching near 10gbps
of youtube traffic. Very happy with how it turned out
On 8/27/2019 8:35 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
> What was the outcome?
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019, 8:35 PM Jon Sands <fohdeesha at gmail.com
> <mailto:fohdeesha at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Fixed off list by (several) google employees. Thanks!
>
> On 8/26/2019 10:52 PM, Jon Sands wrote:
> > AS397031 here, located in Telehouse (7 Teleport). We picked up a
> port
> > on NYIIX specifically to peer with google and cloudflare. We were
> > doing around 6gbps inbound from google over the NYIIX for some time
> > then without warning google withdrew routes from us, I'm guessing
> > because too much bandwidth over an IIX and they prefer a private
> > interconnect at that point. So we requested to peer with them via a
> > PNI and were denied, saying they can't do that either as they're
> not
> > located in any Telehouse buildings. So I'm left with no Google
> peering
> >
> > A 10gb wave from where we are to the nearest google peering
> point is
> > basically the same cost as 10gbps from HE, so trying to figure
> out my
> > best options here. Open to suggestions! Ideally we would love to
> peer
> > with google again over NYIIX if possible.
> >
>
> --
> Jon Sands
> MFI Labs
> https://fohdeesha.com/
>
--
Jon Sands
MFI Labs
https://fohdeesha.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190827/39cf46ad/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list