MAP-E

Thu Aug 8 21:32:23 UTC 2019

I think the only reason DS-Lite got more implementations is that it was the first and "only" choice or IPv6-only with IPv4aaS.

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet

El 8/8/19 22:57, "NANOG en nombre de Jay Hanke" <nanog-bounces at nanog.org en nombre de jayhanke at gmail.com> escribió:

    > I can't think of a public presentation off the top of my head that
    > explains how each major transition technology works, and the pros and
    > cons of each. There must be one, but it's hard to cover the major
    > options in an hour.

    Actually your post is better than a presentation. I was quite
    surprised at the adoption rate of DS-Lite. There must be some pretty
    decent B4 implementations with that many operators deployed.

    Even though the spreadsheet is small sample size, there isn't much
    DS-lite deployment in the US.

    So from 10k feet, MAP-E is basically the same thing as DS-Lite except
    for the location of the NAT?

**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.