tony at wicks.co.nz
Thu Aug 8 03:32:35 UTC 2019
It’s a bit more expensive and higher capability (1.2tb vs 400G) than the MX204. But the form factor and capability is very impressive for a little box.
From: Mehmet Akcin <mehmet at akcin.net>
Sent: Thursday, 8 August 2019 3:30 PM
To: Tony Wicks <tony at wicks.co.nz>
Cc: nanog <nanog at nanog.org>
Subject: Re: Mx204 alternative
Thank you! Something within 2U (max) form factor :)
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 8:23 PM Tony Wicks <tony at wicks.co.nz <mailto:tony at wicks.co.nz> > wrote:
Nokia 7750 sr-1.
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org <mailto:nanog-bounces at nanog.org> > On Behalf Of Mehmet Akcin
Sent: Thursday, 8 August 2019 3:03 PM
To: nanog <nanog at nanog.org <mailto:nanog at nanog.org> >
Subject: Mx204 alternative
I am looking for some suggestions on alternatives to mx204.
Any recommendations on something more affordable which can handle full routing tables from two providers?
Prefer Juniper but happy to look alternatives.
Min 6-8 10G ports are required
1G support required
Thanks in advance!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NANOG