MAP-E

Masataka Ohta mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Mon Aug 5 03:13:15 UTC 2019


Valdis Kletnieks wrote:

>>> -> Of course, everything has good and bad things, but with NAT444 you
>>> need to do the same,
>>
>> With static port range assignment, we don't have to.
> 
> So you're going to say what ports the users are forced to use...

Like DHCP, yes. So?

>> Only users know what applications they are using.
> 
> When you don't know what applications on what ports they are using.

You don't have to know, because its user's problem.

>> I'm not interested in poor IPv6.
> 
> Well... if you have poor IPv6 support from your ISP, we can understand that.

You don't understand I was an active member of IPng WG trying to
prevent the WG make poor decisions. I was only partially successful.

							Masataka Ohta



More information about the NANOG mailing list