MAP-E

Mon Aug 5 02:50:02 UTC 2019

On Mon, 05 Aug 2019 06:42:30 +0900, Masataka Ohta said:
> JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
> > A problem of dynamic sharing is that logging information to be used
> > for such purposes as crime investigation becomes huge.
>
> > -> Of course, everything has good and bad things, but with NAT444 you
> > need to do the same,
>
> With static port range assignment, we don't have to.

So you're going to say what ports the users are forced to use...

> Only users know what applications they are using.

When you don't know what applications on what ports they are using.

Gotcha.

> I'm not interested in poor IPv6.

Well... if you have poor IPv6 support from your ISP, we can understand that.
Have you tried talking to your ISP and getting them to provide good IPv6 support?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190804/b4848545/attachment.sig>