[nanog] Cisco GLBP/HSRP question -- Has it ever been discussed to publish fully/in-part the specifications

• Previous message (by thread): [nanog] Cisco GLBP/HSRP question -- Has it ever been discussed to publish fully/in-part the specifications
• Next message (by thread): [nanog] Cisco GLBP/HSRP question -- Has it ever been discussed to publish fully/in-part the specifications
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2281

I don't think any work for GLBP exists in IETF.

On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 at 16:16, Chriztoffer Hansen
<chriztoffer at netravnen.de> wrote:
>
> Cisco has their FHR protocol specifications protected as proprietary IP.
>
> * Gateway Load Balancing Protocol (GLBP)
> * Hot Standby Router Protocol (HSRP)
> * https://packetlife.net/media/library/3/First_Hop_Redundancy.pdf
>
> Apart from the EIGRP specifications. Which has become publicly available
> in-part.
>
> Q: Anyone know about if the same has ever been discussed with regards to
> their HSRP and GLBP protocol specifications?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Chriztoffer
>


-- 
  ++ytti

• Previous message (by thread): [nanog] Cisco GLBP/HSRP question -- Has it ever been discussed to publish fully/in-part the specifications
• Next message (by thread): [nanog] Cisco GLBP/HSRP question -- Has it ever been discussed to publish fully/in-part the specifications
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]