MAP-E

Fri Aug 2 13:58:45 UTC 2019

On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 at 14:49, Brian J. Murrell <brian at interlinx.bc.ca> wrote:

> Will any of these (including MAP-E) support such nasty (in terms of
> burying IP addresses in data payloads) protocols as FTP and SIP/SDP?
>

I'm a fan of these solutions that (only) use NAT44 in the CPE as this is
exactly what they're currently doing, and the CPE vendors have already
"solved" the problem of  application support (SIP, FTP etc.) at least as
far as the end-user is concerned.

It seems that introducing an extra layer of NAT at the ISP for NAT444 is
creating a range of new problems, not least being scalability.  Big CGNAT
boxes are expensive.

Aled
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190802/d55bc2f5/attachment.html>