MAP-E

Brian J. Murrell brian at interlinx.bc.ca
Fri Aug 2 13:48:06 UTC 2019


On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 15:37 +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
wrote:
> Ask the vendor to support RFC8585.
> 
>  
> 
> Also, you can do it with OpenWRT.
> 
>  
> 
> I think 464XLAT is a better option and both of them are supported by
> OpenWRT.
> 
>  
> 
> You can also use OpenSource (Jool) for the NAT64.

Will any of these (including MAP-E) support such nasty (in terms of
burying IP addresses in data payloads) protocols as FTP and SIP/SDP?

Cheers,
b.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190802/f05936db/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list