looking for hostname router identifier validation

Tue Apr 30 01:18:53 UTC 2019

I legit guffawed.

On 19-04-29 13 h 13, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> I would caution against putting much faith in the validity of
> geolocation or site ID by reverse DNS PTR records. There are a vast
> number of unmaintained, ancient, stale, erroneous or wildly wrong PTR
> records out there. I can name at least a half dozen ISPs that have
> absorbed other ASes, some of those which also acquired other ASes
> earlier in their history, forming a turducken of obsolete PTR records
> that has things with ISP domain names last in use in the year 2002.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 6:15 AM Matthew Luckie <mjl at luckie.org.nz
> <mailto:mjl at luckie.org.nz>> wrote:
>
>     Hi NANOG,
>
>     To support Internet topology analysis efforts, I have been working on
>     an algorithm to automatically detect router names inside hostnames
>     (PTR records) for router interfaces, and build regular expressions
>     (regexes) to extract them.  By "router name" inside the hostname, I
>     mean a substring, or set of non-contiguous substrings, that is common
>     among interfaces on a router.  For example, suppose we had the
>     following three routers in the savvis.net <http://savvis.net>
>     domain suffix, each with two
>     interfaces:
>
>     das1-v3005.nj2.savvis.net <http://das1-v3005.nj2.savvis.net>
>     das1-v3006.nj2.savvis.net <http://das1-v3006.nj2.savvis.net>
>
>     das1-v3005.oc2.savvis.net <http://das1-v3005.oc2.savvis.net>
>     das1-v3007.oc2.savvis.net <http://das1-v3007.oc2.savvis.net>
>
>     das2-v3009.nj2.savvis.net <http://das2-v3009.nj2.savvis.net>
>     das2-v3012.nj2.savvis.net <http://das2-v3012.nj2.savvis.net>
>
>     We might infer the router names are das1|nj2, das1|oc2, and das2|nj2,
>     respectively, and captured by the regex:
>     ^([a-z]+\d+)-[^\.]+\.([a-z]+\d+)\.savvis\.net$
>
>     After much refinement based on smaller sets of ground truth, I'm
>     asking for broader feedback from operators.  I've placed a webpage at
>     https://www.caida.org/~mjl/rnc/ that shows the inferences my algorithm
>     made for 2523 domains.  If you operate one of the domains in that
>     list, I would appreciate it if you could comment (private is probably
>     better but public is fine with me) on whether the regex my algorithm
>     inferred represents your naming intent.  In the first instance, I am
>     most interested in feedback for the suffix / date combinations for
>     suffixes that are colored green, i.e. appear to be reasonable.
>
>     Each suffix / date combination links to a page that contains the
>     naming convention and corresponding inferences.  The colored part of
>     each hostname is the inferred router name.  The green hostnames appear
>     to be correct, at least as far as the algorithm determined. Some
>     suffixes have errors due to either stale hostnames or incorrect
>     training data, and those hostnames are colored red or orange.
>
>     If anyone is interested in sets of hostnames the algorithm may have
>     inferred as 'stale' for their network, because for some operators it
>     was an oversight and they were grateful to learn about it, I can
>     provide that information.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Matthew
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190429/b1d1b34a/attachment.html>